Do we have strength not to sneeze?

By Richard Payne, MD, Orlando Sentinel, April 3, 2006

Opinion

Had Martin Luther King Jr. not been assassinated on April 4 in 1968, statistics suggest it still is unlikely that he would be alive now. The average life expectancy for black men in the United States is just 69.2 years (compared with 75.4 years for white men), and the celebrated civil-rights leader was born 77 years ago.

King's views on harnessing non-violent action to confront and defeat racial, economic and social injustice are well-known. Less well-known are his strongly held views on health inequalities, and I suspect that -- had he beaten the odds -- he would be deeply disturbed about the state of health disparities between different racial and ethnic groups in the United States today.

King once said, "Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane." How then would he respond to a recent analysis of U.S. mortality data indicating that if differences in age-adjusted mortality rates between blacks and whites were eliminated during the decade of the 1990s, nearly a million African-American lives would have been saved?

Although cancer death rates have been falling for all Americans, black men still die of this disease at 1.4 times the rate of white men. Similarly, infant mortality rates show a wide gap separating white and black Americans. Racially based health disparities are pervasive, both in diagnosis and in treatment. They influence important health indicators such as the prevalence of breast-cancer screening; the use of medications to prevent second heart attacks; the number of follow-up visits to doctors' offices; the use of kidney dialysis machines; and the availability of pain medications in white and non-white communities. All of these factors result in higher mortality rates for non-white communities in almost every disease category.

Use of hospice further underscores differences in care for the seriously ill. Recent statistics from the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization indicate that blacks accounted for fewer than 10 percent of patients, even though they represent nearly 13 percent of the total population and have significantly higher overall mortality rates than whites.

To be sure, individuals must take responsibility for their own health. However, healthier behaviors on the part of minorities alone will not overcome these health-care deficits. Many disparities reflect persistent institutional and societal barriers to equitable access to quality health care for minorities. I am confident that King would have been in favor of two important strategies that grow from the numerous recommendations put forth by health planners and policy makers.

First, is there any doubt that King would have been on the forefront of arguments for payment of a living wage to the working poor, and that he would have advocated for universal health care? Of the 48 million medically uninsured Americans, 22 percent and 36 percent are African-American and Hispanic, respectively, compared with 14.5 percent of whites.

Increasing the numbers of African-Americans working in the health-care field is another important strategy to employ in closing this gap. African-American physicians are more likely than white physicians to live and practice in urban and minority communities. They also proportionately take care of a larger percentage of black patients than do white physicians.

So, as a second measure, I am certain that King would have supported affirmative action -- especially to increase the ranks of African-American health-care providers. King famously said that his children should be judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin. But consider these additional statements: "We must come to see that the roots of racism are very deep in our country, and there must be something positive and massive done in order to get rid of all the effects of racism and the tragedies of racial injustice." And, "Whenever the issue of compensatory treatment for the Negro is raised, some of our friends recoil in horror. The Negro should be granted equality, they agree, but he should ask nothing more. On the surface this appears reasonable, but it is not realistic."

In the last speech of his life in Memphis -- his famous "I've been to the mountaintop" speech -- King recalled an earlier attempt on his life. In New York, he was stabbed by a deranged woman, narrowly escaping death when the knife lodged inches from his aorta. He was told that if he had sneezed, he would have died. This prompted a white high-school student to write to him saying that she was "so happy that you didn't sneeze."

Americans of all races and ethnicity can truly keep King's great dreams alive by exhibiting the courage to support adequate health care for all and by showing the strength not to sneeze in the face of these deadly health inequalities.

Richard Payne, M.D., is director of the Duke Institute on Care at the End of Life, Duke Divinity School.

Defend dignity. Take action.

For more than 14 years, the Death with Dignity National Center (DDNC), a 501(c)(3), non-partisan, non-profit organization, has been the leading advocate in the death with dignity movement. Leaders in our organization originally wrote and have continued advocating for the Oregon Death with Dignity Law. DDNC has met these challenges through extensive legal defense of the Oregon law, education and outreach programs, and by developing and nurturing diverse financial resources with one goal in mind: to ensure DDNC's financial vitality and its position as a leader in the death with dignity movement.

Your donation today will enable us to continue to advocate for the right of the terminally ill to die with dignity. Please click here to give a secure, online donation. Thank you.

Get Email Updates

Sign up for the latest news, blogs, and action alerts in the fight for Death with Dignity.

Political Action Fund

The Death with Dignity National Center partners with the Oregon Death with Dignity Political Action Fund (the Fund) to conduct lobbying and political activities in order to achieve the enactment of Death with Dignity laws in other states. The partnership resulted in tremendous success with the resounding win in the 2008 Washington Death with Dignity campaign.

Learn more about the Fund's efforts to bring dignity to people around the nation.

About Death with Dignity

The greatest human freedom is to live, and die, according to one's own desires and beliefs. The most common desire among those with a terminal illness is to die with some measure of dignity. From advance directives to physician-assisted dying, death with dignity is a movement to provide options for the dying to control their own end-of-life care.

Death with Dignity National Center (DDNC) is the leader in this movement, successfully establishing, advancing and defending the landmark Oregon Death with Dignity Act -- a national catalyst for openly discussing and actively reforming end-of-life care for those who are terminally ill.

Learn more about the National Center and our family of organizations.

Patients & Families

The Death with Dignity National Center was formed out of a profound commitment to the idea that personal end-of-life decisions should be made solely between a patient and a physician. Based on this commitment, we are pleased to provide you with support and information as you face the difficult challenges ahead.

Access resources for patients and families.

Research Center

We have compiled a comprehensive collection of legal briefs, journal articles, and newspaper clippings. We invite you to explore the wide array of information we have collected throughout our history.

In our Research Center you will find frequently asked questions, the history of the death with dignity movement, state monitoring statistics, and a copy of this groundbreaking statute.

Dive into the archives of the National Center.