|
from our blog: living with dying |
Myth 2: It attacks the dignity and threatens the lives of people with disabilities
Posted by Melissa Barber on February 21, 2012
Reality: This lie is quite pervasive. In order to qualify to make a request for medication under the Oregon and Washington Death with Dignity Acts, a person must be an adult (over the age of 18), a resident of Oregon or Washington, judged mentally competent by his or her physicians, and have a terminal illness which will result in death in six months or fewer. Nowhere in these laws does having a disability qualify an individual to request life-ending medication.
In fact, in section 127.805 s.2.01 the Oregon law specifically states, "No person shall qualify under the provisions of ORS 127.800 to 127.897 solely because of age or disability." The Washington Death with Dignity Act has the same stipulation in section 70-245-020. The proposed laws introduced in Massachusetts (Section 2) and Vermont (page 5, lines 16-19) have the same safeguards.
Research shows these protections work. Independent studies have found no evidence of risk to individuals living with disabilities under Oregon's Death with Dignity law. Here's one such published and peer-reviewed study.
This myth is a scare tactic, plain and simple, and glosses over the fact that Death with Dignity laws offer protections for all people living with or without disabilities. The multiple safeguards ensure the decision to shorten one's suffering when enduring a terminal illness rests solely in the hands of the person who's dying, and no one else.
Defend dignity. Take action.
You are the key to ensuring well-crafted Death with Dignity laws for all Americans. With your financial and volunteer help, the Death with Dignity National Center, a 501(c)(3), non-partisan, non-profit organization, has been the leading advocate in the death with dignity movement. Member contributions helped us pass a new Death with Dignity law in Washington, defend the Oregon law, and provide education and outreach programs for the vitality of the death with dignity movement.









Comments
Your last paragraph highlights an important angle on this myth about the effect of the law on people with disabilities: They too get terminal illnesses, related or unrelated to their disabilities, and they too deserve the right to autonomy over their bodies, especially at end-of-life. More than most, people with disabilities have lifelong experience with medical care providers, and they understand the potentially devastating effects of having no control over their medical treatment. When faced with end-of-life decisions, they have the same concerns and interests as all dying people--including a desire for dignity, control and comfort. In the states where it has been enacted, this law offers that right to all citizens with terminal illnesses, regardless of their prior medical status. As you show, people with disabilities have nothing to fear from these laws, and they have everything to gain by their passage.
Very well said, Nora! Thank you for adding your thoughts.
Best,
Melissa
-----------
Melissa Barber
Electronic Communications Specialist
Death with Dignity National Center